Skip to content

Is the home-screen widget upsell growing in apps?

  • By Ali Abouelatta
  • n = 730
  • Published
  • Updated
  • 2 min read
  • upsell · retention · monetization · mobile · ux-patterns

Short answer

Yes, steadily. Home-screen widget upsells rose from 3.4% of captured apps in 2023 to 7.5% in 2025 (55 of 730 companies) - roughly a doubling off a small base source[1]. It is a slow, consistent climb rather than a breakout. If you are deciding whether to prompt users to add a widget, the trend is quietly upward but still a minority pattern.

The quotable stat
Home-screen widget upsells grew from 3.4% of captured apps in 2023 to 7.5% in 2025 (July 2026).

Bar chart · Companies with pattern

Companies with pattern — The trend: a steady climb off a small base

One block is about 2 Companies with pattern

2023
10
2024
21
2025
55

The trend: a steady climb off a small base

Share of captured apps showing a home-screen widget upsell, by capture year:

Capture yearCompanies with patternCohort sizePrevalence
2023102933.4% source[1]
2024213995.3% source[1]
2025557307.5% source[1]

Each year gained roughly two points of share - a consistent, monotonic climb, unlike the spike-and-retreat patterns (streaks, countdown timers) elsewhere in this family source[1].

How to apply it

The steady, uninterrupted rise makes the widget upsell a lower-risk bet than the peaked patterns: it is still climbing, so you would be joining a growing behavior rather than a plateaued one. At 7.5% it remains a minority tactic, best suited to apps where a glanceable home-screen surface (weather, tracking, streaks, reminders) adds real daily value. Prompt for it after activation, not during onboarding, given the small base of apps that have made it work.

Caveats

Prevalence is deduped by distinct company and matched on %widget%; it is a lower bound bounded by tag recall, and the broad 'widget' term may catch some non-upsell widget UI source[1]. Base sizes are small (10-55 companies), so treat the slope as directional source[1]. Partial-2026 (4 apps) is excluded as a thin-capture artifact source[2].

Real in-market screens

Screens from real, in-market apps, tracked by Lazyweb Research.

  • Facetime home screen — real in-market example tracked by Lazyweb Research
    Facetime1206 × 2622opens the full image
  • Chevron Account Setup screen — real in-market example tracked by Lazyweb Research
    Chevron1206 × 2622opens the full image
  • Google Photos loading screen screen — real in-market example tracked by Lazyweb Research
    Google Photos1290 × 2796opens the full image
  • Koyfin Onboarding screen — real in-market example tracked by Lazyweb Research
    Koyfin1206 × 2622opens the full image

The numbers

#StatComputed from
[1]3.4% (2023, 10/293) -> 5.3% (2024, 21/399) -> 7.5% (2025, 55/730)widget_upsell_prevalence_over_time
[2]2026 partial = 4 apps, excluded as thin-capture artifactwidget_upsell_prevalence_over_time / smallSampleWarnings

Methodology

Universe: 47,578 capture-dated screenshots across 809 tracked mobile apps. Method: for each capture year, share of distinct companies whose screens carry a widget tag. Reliable window 2023-2025; partial-2026 excluded. Caveat: broad 'widget' term and small base make the slope directional; tag-matched prevalence is a lower bound.

Sources

  1. [1]

    Lazyweb Research analysis of 809 tracked apps (mobile-app corpus, 47,578 capture-dated screenshots), July 2026

    Prevalence = share of companies captured each year whose screens carry a `%widget%` tag, deduped by company_name.

    Back to text

  2. [2]

    Lazyweb Research analysis of 809 tracked apps (mobile-app corpus, 47,578 capture-dated screenshots), July 2026

    2026 captures run only through Jul 4 with thin tagging; that year is excluded from the trend.

    Back to text

Source: Lazyweb Research — proprietary analysis of real, in-market app screens. Cite as Lazyweb Research, 2026-07-07.