Layershttps://layers.to/

Your landing page’s weakest score is Value props.

How Layers ranks

  1. 1.Dribbble69
  2. 2.Behance63
  3. 3.romeet-chatterjee.vercel.app61
  4. 4.Layers53
Fix Value props
53Growth scoreupdated

category scores

Value props32Information hierarchy42
category scoresShowHide
Value props32Information hierarchy42

Value props

32Poor

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Working

  • Gallery shows real designer work instantly
  • Jobs rail hints at hiring value
  • Content quality does implicit selling

Could improve

  • No headline states what Layers is
  • No outcome attached to 'Join for free'
  • Only value copy in fold is a third-party ad

Information hierarchy

42Poor

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture1234
  1. Category filter row — Eleven equal-weight filter pills compete at the top with no headline or value proposition anywhere in the fold.
  2. Truncated shot titles — Every card caption cuts off mid-phrase ('Wilson - Automation Agent - O…'), so the grid's own labels fail to communicate.
  3. Fountn ad card — The sidebar ad is the largest text block in the fold and outranks any Layers messaging, pulling attention off-site.
  4. Recent jobs list — Five outbound job listings stack in the sidebar fold, each an exit path with no clear tie to a primary action.

Trust

58Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Layers desktop capture for Trust

How Layers compares

Trust read

CTA

64Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Layersin-product action

How Layers compares

Recommended rewrites

Mobile web

68Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Layers mobile capture for Mobile web

What works

What to improve