Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.
How Emma ranks
- 1.
Emma73
- 2.
potzo.cc72
- 3.
Plum69
- 4.
Chip66
category scores
category scoresShowHide
Trust
52FairProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.




| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| Emma | Detailed in-app phone mockup showing balances, credit score "580 / 710", and "Round ups £2.40 Saved this week" |
| 9,152 transactions covered so far | |
| App Store badge with 4.5-star rating and "53K Reviews" | |
| FSCS Protected, Trustpilot 'Rated Excellent', and Moneyfacts 'Best no notice account provider June 2026' badge row under |
Value props
72FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
Take control of your money
Download Emma to build your credit, save more and spend less with the all-in-one financial membership.
Working
- Subhead names 3 real outcomes
- Emotional hook: control
- Hero UI shows real balances
Could improve
- H1 is generic, fits any fintech
- No proof stats or numbers in copy
- "Membership" is left unexplained
Information hierarchy
78FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

What works
What to improve
CTA
78FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

How Emma compares
Recommended rewrites
Mobile web
86StrongThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.

What works
What to improve
