Skip to content

How Common Is Facebook Login on App Signup Screens in 2026?

  • By Ali Abouelatta
  • n = 289
  • Published
  • Updated
  • 2 min read
  • signup · onboarding · mobile · ux-patterns

Short answer

Of 289 apps with captured auth screens tracked by Lazyweb Research, only 22.1% (64 apps) still show a Facebook login button.source[1] That is less than half the prevalence of Google (48.8%) or Apple (43.6%), making Facebook a minority provider rather than a default.

The quotable stat
Facebook login appears on just 22.1% of 289 apps with captured auth screens, less than half of Google's 48.8% (Lazyweb Research, July 2026).

Bar chart · Share

Share — Facebook vs the field

One block is about 2.6%

Email
72.7% [4]
Google
48.8% [2]
Apple
43.6% [3]
Phone / OTP
26.0% [5]
Facebook
22.1% [1]

The finding

Facebook login is present on 64 of 289 apps (22.1%) with vision-extracted auth screens.source[1] It sits far behind Google (141 apps, 48.8%), Apple (126, 43.6%), and email (210, 72.7%), and even trails phone/OTP (75, 26.0%).number[2]number[3]number[4]number[5] Among social providers specifically, Facebook is clearly the third choice.

Facebook vs the field

ProviderAppsShare
Email21072.7% number[4]
Google14148.8% number[2]
Apple12643.6% number[3]
Phone / OTP7526.0% number[5]
Facebook6422.1% source[1]

Facebook is the only 'big' social provider under 25% prevalence in the tracked set.

How to apply it

Facebook login is no longer table-stakes: fewer than one in four tracked apps still surface it.source[1] If you are trimming an auth screen, Facebook is the safest social button to drop — Google and Apple carry roughly double its prevalence and cover most social-login expectations.number[2]number[3] Keep it only if your audience skews toward demographics that still favor Facebook accounts.

Caveats

Extraction-based: 22.1% reflects Facebook buttons detected on captured screens across 289 apps, not a full provider audit.source[1] Some apps may offer Facebook behind an 'other options' expander not shown on the captured screen.

Real in-market screens

Screens from real, in-market apps, tracked by Lazyweb Research.

  • Discord Account Login screen — real in-market example tracked by Lazyweb Research
    Discord1290 × 2796opens the full image
  • Epoch Times Account Login screen — real in-market example tracked by Lazyweb Research
    Epoch Times1206 × 2622opens the full image
  • Nextdoor Account Login screen — real in-market example tracked by Lazyweb Research
    Nextdoor1179 × 2556opens the full image
  • Splitwise Account Login screen — real in-market example tracked by Lazyweb Research
    Splitwise1206 × 2622opens the full image

The numbers

#StatComputed from
[1]22.1% (64/289)facebook_auth_prevalence
[2]48.8% (141/289)sign_in_with_google_prevalence
[3]43.6% (126/289)sign_in_with_apple_prevalence
[4]72.7% (210/289)email_auth_prevalence
[5]26.0% (75/289)phone_auth_prevalence

Methodology

Universe: 289 mobile apps with a vision-extracted auth screen. Facebook detected via regex ('with facebook','facebook sign','facebook login') over vision text, deduped per company, July 2026. Extraction-based; absence is not proof of absence.

Sources

  1. [1]

    Lazyweb Research analysis of 289 apps (mobile apps with vision-extracted auth screens), July 2026

    Facebook-button prevalence via vision-text regex over 289 apps' captured signup/login screens, deduped per company.

    Back to text

Source: Lazyweb Research — proprietary analysis of real, in-market app screens. Cite as Lazyweb Research, 2026-07-07.

Explore the evidence