Lettahttps://letta.com/

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

How Letta ranks

  1. 1.Mem078
  2. 2.Zep78
  3. 3.Skillsync69
  4. 4.Pieces67
  5. 5.Letta52
Fix Trust
52Growth scoreupdated

category scores

Trust42CTA44
category scoresShowHide
Trust42CTA44

Trust

42Poor

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Letta
Zep
Mem0
Skillsync
Pieces
Trust read
LettaResearch listing "Memory Models: Towards Agents That Learn — JUN 2026"
Skillsync"WORKS WITH" integration logo row (Anthropic, OpenAI, and other agent tools)
PiecesDetailed product screenshot showing the Pieces app with a dated activity timeline and summary cards ("Standup Update", "
Mem0GitHub star badge showing "61,868" stars in the nav
Zep"TRUSTED BY AI TEAMS" logo wall with Samsung, Zscaler, HoneYBOOK, Quorum, and AGI, Inc.

CTA

44Poor

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Zep
Mem0
Skillsyncin-product action
Pieces

Problems

  • no primary CTA anywhere on fold
  • nav links are the only actions
  • no visual hierarchy among links
  • nothing echoes the intro's promise

Mobile web

56Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Letta mobile capture for Mobile web

What works

What to improve

Information hierarchy

58Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Letta desktop capture for Information hierarchy

What works

What to improve

Value props

60Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Letta’s headlineLetta is an AI research lab in San Francisco building machines that learn. We envision a future where humans coexist with digital people: experiential agents th

Working

Could improve