Your landing page’s weakest score is Value props.
How Covenant ranks
- 1.
Crosby68
- 2.
Athena57
- 3.
Covenant52
category scores
category scoresShowHide
Value props
27PoorTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
ONE COVENANT, MANY ORDERS
Working
- Memorable, distinctive brand voice
- Clean split framing of two offerings
- Strong visual identity supports intrigue
Could improve
- No statement of what Covenant does
- No subhead, numbers, or outcomes
- CTAs assume insider knowledge
Trust
35PoorProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.


| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| Covenant | No visible trust signal identified. |
| "Backed by a16z / speedrun" investor line | |
| Built By Lawyers, For Sales Teams, To Speed Up Time to Signature |
CTA
60FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

How Covenant compares
Recommended rewrites
Information hierarchy
64FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

What works
What to improve
Mobile web
76FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.

What works
What to improve
