Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.
How Antiwork ranks
- 1.
Antiwork61
- 2.
brolabs.ai61
- 3.
thingify.tools61
- 4.
Every60
category scores
category scoresShowHide
Trust
48PoorProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.


| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| Antiwork | "Ask Gumclaw" FAQ widget answer: "I answer support tickets, review and merge code, screen sellers for fraud, issue payou |
| No visible trust signal identified. | |
| Named author bylines with headshots (KIERAN KLAASSEN, KATIE PARROTT) on real published essays | |
| No visible trust signal identified. |
Information hierarchy
58FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?
123- Expanded accordion answer — A six-line text wall opens by default, pushing all other questions down and making the fold read dense before the visitor chooses anything.
- Accordion question stack — Seven+ same-weight rows compete at equal visual priority with no CTA among them, turning the fold into a list instead of one action.
- Headline body styling — 'We automated ourselves out of the work.' is set in small monospace body weight, so the value prop reads as a caption rather than the page's lead message.
Mobile web
58FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.

What works
What to improve
CTA
68FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

How Antiwork compares
Recommended rewrites
Value props
72FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
We automated ourselves out of the work.
Today one AI agent runs the company.
Working
Could improve
