When Do Apps Fire the ATT Prompt in Onboarding?
- By Ali Abouelatta
- n = 12
- Published
- Updated
- 2 min read
- onboarding · mobile · ux-patterns · monetization · experiments
Short answer
Across 12 tracked flows with an ATT prompt in Lazyweb Research's corpus, the ATT ask sits at an average step of 5.9 (median 2) inside longer flows that average 9.6 steps — about 70% of the way through source[1]. ATT lands later and in longer flows than notification or location asks. The pattern: ask for tracking after the user is committed, not on the first screen.
ATT prompts sit at an average step of 5.9 in flows averaging 9.6 steps — later than notification (2.9) or location (2.8) asks — Lazyweb Research, July 2026.
Bar chart · Avg step
Avg step — ATT vs other permissions
One block is about 0.2 Avg step
- Notification [2]
- 2.9
- Location [3]
- 2.8
- ATT [1]
- 5.9
The finding
Across 17 occurrences in 12 flows, ATT prompts land at an average step of 5.9 (median 2), average relative position 0.701, in flows averaging 9.6 steps source[1]. The gap between the mean (5.9) and median (2) signals a split: some apps fire ATT early, but a tail of apps push it deep into long flows, dragging the average up.
ATT vs other permissions
ATT sits later in absolute steps and in the longest flows source[1]source[2]source[3]. But the counter-examples matter: Weight Watchers fired the native ATT dialog over the welcome/auth screen before signup — tracking asked pre-value source[4].
How to apply it
Defer ATT until after the user has invested — completed signup, seen core value — so the tracking ask reads as 'improve what you already like' rather than a cold gate. The corpus's longer ATT flows support this. Asking ATT pre-value (as Weight Watchers does over the welcome screen) is an observed but riskier minority approach source[4].
Caveats
This rests on 12 flows and 17 occurrences — small; lead with counts, not decimals source[1]. The mean is skewed by a few very long flows, so the median (step 2) is the more robust central value. Positions come from ROW_NUMBER over captured screens, not guaranteed full user journeys.
Real in-market screens
Screens from real, in-market apps, tracked by Lazyweb Research.
Tapotron1206 × 2622opens the full image 
I Am Sober1206 × 2622opens the full image 
Resy1206 × 2622opens the full image 
Signal1206 × 2622opens the full image
The numbers
| # | Stat | Computed from |
|---|---|---|
| [1] | ATT avg step 5.9, median 2, relative 0.701, flows average 9.6 steps; 17 occurrences across 12 flows | att_position_in_flows: ROW_NUMBER-ranked flow_steps joined to ATT label set |
| [2] | Notification avg step 2.9, flows average 5.6 steps, relative 0.643 | notification_position_in_flows |
| [3] | Location avg step 2.8, flows average 4.6 steps, relative 0.616 | location_position_in_flows |
| [4] | Weight Watchers fired the native ATT dialog over the welcome/auth screen before signup | qualitative: weight-watchers ATT over welcome screen |
Methodology
Universe: 12 tracked flows (of 2,468) containing an ATT prompt, July 2026. Positions via ROW_NUMBER; small sample so counts and the median lead over the skewed mean.
Sources
- [1]
Lazyweb Research analysis of 12 flows (ATT positions, 2,468 tracked flows), July 2026
Small flow sample; ATT positions via ROW_NUMBER. Mean skewed by long flows, median step 2.
- [2]
Lazyweb Research analysis of 26 flows (notification positions), July 2026
Comparison baseline.
- [3]
Lazyweb Research analysis of 10 flows (location positions), July 2026
Comparison baseline; small sample.
- [4]
Lazyweb Research qualitative review (807-app corpus), July 2026
Weight Watchers named as a pre-value ATT example.
Source: Lazyweb Research — proprietary analysis of real, in-market app screens. Cite as Lazyweb Research, 2026-07-07.