PhotonSpearSR007 landing page report.
← Back to the SR007 rankings

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

Fix Trust
Lazyweb TeamAI Growth PMTurn this score into growth.Analyze your site and propose fixes across conversion and trustBenchmark your Growth Score against similar companiesLearn from growth experiments across 10,000+ top productsStart Team trial

Score over time

60504030BlueHalo 45 on Feb 24 (Wayback)BlueHalo 43 on Mar 9 (Wayback)BlueHalo 41 on Mar 24 (Wayback)BlueHalo 43 on Apr 18 (Wayback)BlueHalo 43 on Apr 27 (Wayback)BlueHalo 44 on May 20 (Wayback)BlueHalo 51 on Jul 28 (Live)Electro Optic Systems (EOS) 49 on Mar 20 (Wayback)Electro Optic Systems (EOS) 49 on Apr 6 (Wayback)Electro Optic Systems (EOS) 50 on Apr 19 (Wayback)Electro Optic Systems (EOS) 40 on May 8 (Wayback)Electro Optic Systems (EOS) 39 on May 19 (Wayback)Electro Optic Systems (EOS) 55 on Jul 28 (Live)nLIGHT 44 on Feb 18 (Wayback)nLIGHT 44 on Mar 4 (Wayback)nLIGHT 44 on Apr 20 (Wayback)nLIGHT 37 on Jun 4 (Wayback)nLIGHT 38 on Jul 11 (Wayback)nLIGHT 56 on Jul 28 (Live)Epirus 46 on May 6 (Wayback)Epirus 47 on May 17 (Wayback)Epirus 47 on May 26 (Wayback)Epirus 47 on Jun 9 (Wayback)Epirus 45 on Jun 27 (Wayback)Epirus 47 on Jul 21 (Wayback)Epirus 57 on Jul 28 (Live)PhotonSpear 48 on Jul 28 (Live)PhotonSpear 57 on Aug 16 (Live)Jul 28Aug 16
Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
  1. Aug 16, 202657LiveOverall +9 · Mobile web +22 · Value props +16Viewing
  2. Jul 28, 202648First tracked report — strongest Information hierarchy 58, weakest CTA 42View →

Trust

30Poor

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Electro Optic Systems (EOS)
nLIGHT
Epirus
Trust read
PhotonSpearNo visible trust signal identified.
BlueHaloNo visible trust signal identified.
Electro Optic Systems (EOS)Real photo of an EOS remote weapon station mounted on a vehicle below the hero
nLIGHTReal photograph of the HADES laser hardware unit in the hero
EpirusHero field footage of a military vehicle carrying mounted hardware on a desert road

CTA

56Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

PhotonSpear
BlueHalo
Epirus
nLIGHT
Electro Optic Systems (EOS)

Problems

  • nav-only, no hero CTA
  • small vs huge headline
  • click feels like sales contact
  • no value promised by label

Value props

58Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

PhotonSpear’s headline undersellsPhotonSpearPhoton Spear builds directed-energy systems for defense.

Working

  • Subhead states category plainly
  • Hero visual shows defense mission
  • No buzzword inflation

Could improve

  • Headline is just the brand name
  • No outcome or capability claim
  • Zero numbers or proof points

Information hierarchy

68Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture123
  1. PhotonSpear headline — Headline and subtitle sit bottom-left while the eye is drawn to the spear graphic top-right, splitting the scan path.
  2. Get In Touch button — Low-contrast dark outline button in the top-right corner reads as a nav item, not the page's one action.
  3. Defense subtitle text — Small grey type over a busy earth render; the only explanation of what PhotonSpear does is the least legible element.

Mobile web

72Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture12
  1. GET IN TOUCH button — Small desktop-proportioned outline button tucked in the header corner instead of a full-width thumb target.
  2. Outline CTA contrast — Thin ghost border on a black background gives the only action little visual weight against the bright spear graphic.

Competitors

inferred from product, audience, and value prop