Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.
How Zoo (formerly KittyCAD) ranks
- 1.
Aurorin CAD72
- 2.
Shapr3D72
- 3.
Plasticity70
- 4.
Zoo (formerly KittyCAD)54
- 5.
Onshape54
- 6.
Fusion (Autodesk Fusion 360)51
category scores
category scoresShowHide
Trust
44PoorProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.





| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| Zoo (formerly KittyCAD) | "API Makeathon submissions are LIVE" banner with dates "JULY 22 - AUGUST 5, 2026" |
| "Backed by Y Combinator" badge above the headline | |
| Dimmed background screenshot of the real AI prompt UI ("Design a manufact... heat exchanger based on NSI, AS...") paired | |
| Real Shapr3D app shown running on an iPad with stylus in the demo video frame | |
| Construction industry card showing a tablet displaying real CAD drawing software in a worker's hands | |
| Real 3D modeling viewport render with fillet-editing handles beneath the labeled feature tabs (Direct Editing, Dimension |
Value props
48PoorTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
Next-Gen CAD Built for the Modern Era
Zoo Design Studio introduces Zookeeper, a conversational CAD agent for reasoning-driven design on a modern geometry engine.
Working
- Subhead names the actual product mechanism
- "Try in browser" lowers friction to proof
- Distinct, memorable brand voice
Could improve
- H1 is buzzwords: could caption any CAD tool
- No numbers, outcomes, or proof points
- Mascot hero decorates instead of demos
Mobile web
48PoorThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.

What works
What to improve
Information hierarchy
63FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

What works
What to improve
CTA
66FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

How Zoo (formerly KittyCAD) compares
Recommended rewrites
