Your landing page’s weakest score is CTA.
How Structure Therapeutics ranks
- 1.
LionBio Therapeutics75
- 2.
Rani Therapeutics74
- 3.
Entera Bio61
- 4.
Structure Therapeutics53
- 5.
Oramed Pharmaceuticals48
CTA
42PoorCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?



Problems
- no CTA anywhere above the fold
- nav links are the only actions
- mobile fold has zero tappable action
- headline promise ends with no next step
Trust
47PoorProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.


| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| Structure Therapeutics | No visible trust signal identified. |
| "Columbia — University spinout technology" credential in the stats strip | |
| "3 Phase 1 studies completed" stat badge | |
| No visible trust signal identified. | |
| No visible trust signal identified. |
Value props
48PoorTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
Medicine is our platform. Accessibility is our cure.
To us, science isn't cutting edge unless it reaches the edge of the world. Medicine isn't transformative unless it transforms as many lives as possible.
Working
Could improve
Information hierarchy
64FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

What works
What to improve
Mobile web
64FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.

What works
What to improve
