Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.
How Oruk ranks
category scores
category scoresShowHide
Trust
64FairProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.


| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| Oruk | "built by researchers from" strip with Stanford, Berkeley, UC Santa Barbara, and University of Cambridge wordmarks |
| "Our decades of research in multimodal emotional intelligence span" with stat counters 50+ / 48+ / 600+ | |
| Customer logo strip: Daily, Cresta, Granola, VAPI, Decagon, kore.ai, NiCE, Cognigy | |
| Interactive 'Realtime Speech-to-Text API' demo widget with 'Try it out' button and live code sample | |
| Live interactive transcription demo with "Start speaking" button and "Frustrated caller" sample | |
| Live counter: "26,500,010 hours of audio transcribed" |
Value props
66FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
speech ai that actually understands you
Working
- Live demo shows emotion detection in action
- "actually" implies rivals fail at understanding
- Stanford/Berkeley/Cambridge researcher proof
Could improve
- No subhead explaining what Oruk does
- No audience, use case, or outcome named
- Zero concrete numbers in the copy itself
CTA
78FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

How Oruk compares
Recommended rewrites
Information hierarchy
80StrongDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

What works
What to improve
Mobile web
80StrongThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.

What works
What to improve
