Skip to content

Which Apps Run The Most Signup And Onboarding Experiments?

  • By Ali Abouelatta
  • n = 4,814
  • Published
  • Updated
  • 2 min read
  • signup · onboarding · experiments · mobile · ux-patterns · saas

Short answer

Across 4,814 detected experiments spanning 276 companies (July 2026), signup and account-login screens account for roughly 376 labeled experiments — sign up (127), account login (167), and account setup (82). source[1] At the company level, ChatGPT (at least 18 signup), Chime (17), Disney (17), and Capital One (14) lead the detected signup work. source[2] These are observed variations, not confirmed A/B tests.

The quotable stat
Sign-up, account-login, and account-setup screens carry 376 labeled experiments across the corpus (July 2026); ChatGPT leads companies with at least 18 signup experiments.

Bar chart · Signup experiments (lower bound)

Signup experiments (lower bound) — The leaderboard

One block is about 0.6 Signup experiments (lower bound)

ChatGPT
at least 18 [2]
Chime
at least 17 [2]
Disney
at least 17 [2]
Capital One
at least 14 [2]
Bumble
at least 13 [2]
Adidas
at least 12 [2]
Delta
at least 12 [2]
Babbel
at least 11 [2]
Replit
at least 13 [2]
Zoom
at least 10 [2]

The finding

Across the corpus of 4,814 detected experiments (276 companies), the labeled signup-adjacent categories total roughly 376 experiments: sign up (127), account login (167), and account setup (82). source[1] At the company level, the deepest detected signup programs are ChatGPT (at least 18), Chime (17), Disney (17), and Capital One (14). source[2]

The leaderboard

Signup-heavy companies span AI, fintech, and streaming.

CompanySignup experiments (lower bound)
ChatGPTat least 18 source[2]
Chimeat least 17 source[2]
Disneyat least 17 source[2]
Capital Oneat least 14 source[2]
Bumbleat least 13 source[2]
Adidasat least 12 source[2]
Deltaat least 12 source[2]
Babbelat least 11 source[2]
Replitat least 13 source[2]
Zoomat least 10 source[2]

How to apply it

These are the apps to study when redesigning a signup or onboarding flow — they have the most detected iteration on those screens, so their current designs reflect the most experimentation. The recurring detected direction across them (Zoom, Replit, Wattpad, Brainly) is email-first entry, promoting links to buttons, and leading with value before credentials. Cite the per-company volume; individual diffs are covered on the company pages. All figures are detected variations. source[1]

Caveats

All figures are observed variations with LLM-inferred rationale, not company-confirmed A/B tests — no lift is measured. source[1] Surface splits are lower bounds because screen category is unlabeled on 1,425 experiments. source[3]

The numbers

#StatComputed from
[1]376 labeled signup-adjacent experiments (sign up 127, account login 167, account setup 82) within 4,814top_experiment_screen_categories (sign_up 127, account_login 167, account setup 82)
[2]Company signup leaders: ChatGPT 18, Chime 17, Disney 17, Capital One 14, Bumble 13, Replit 13, Adidas 12, Delta 12, Babbel 11, Zoom 10company_total signup splits: chatgpt 18, chime 17, disney 17, capital-one 14, bumble 13, replit 13, adidas 12, delta 12, babbel 11, zoom 10
[3]1,425 of 4,814 experiments have no screen categoryscreen_category_null_on_experiments (1425/4814)

Methodology

Universe: 4,814 detected experiments across 276 companies, July 2026. Extraction: screen-category and per-company splits (COUNT DISTINCT experiment_id) on observed diffs. Caveat: detected variations only; splits are lower bounds.

Sources

  1. [1]

    Lazyweb Research analysis of 4,814 detected experiments (276 companies, ~800-app mobile corpus), July 2026

    Labeled screen-category counts for sign up / account login / account setup.

    Back to text

  2. [2]

    Lazyweb Research analysis of 4,814 detected experiments (276 companies), July 2026

    Per-company signup/onboarding surface splits (COUNT DISTINCT experiment_id).

    Back to text

  3. [3]

    Lazyweb Research analysis of 4,814 detected experiments (276 companies), July 2026

    screen_category NULL on 1,425 experiments; splits are lower bounds.

    Back to text

Source: Lazyweb Research — proprietary analysis of real, in-market app screens. Cite as Lazyweb Research, 2026-07-07.

Explore the evidence