Skip to content

Which Apps Run The Most Detected UI Experiments Overall?

  • By Ali Abouelatta
  • n = 4,814
  • Published
  • Updated
  • 2 min read
  • experiments · saas · mobile · ux-patterns · design · landing-page

Short answer

Across 4,814 detected UI experiments spanning 276 companies (July 2026), DoorDash leads with 221 distinct experiments — 2.6x the second-place app, Wattpad (85). source[1]source[2] The top of the ranking is dominated by high-frequency consumer apps, and 138 of 276 companies clear the 10-experiment bar. source[3] These are observed before/after variations with inferred rationale, not company-confirmed A/B tests.

The quotable stat
DoorDash leads the corpus with 221 detected experiments (July 2026), more than the next two apps combined; 138 of 276 companies have 10 or more.

Bar chart · Detected experiments

Detected experiments — The finding

One block is about 7.9 Detected experiments

01DoorDash
221 [1]
02Wattpad
85 [2]
03Replit
77 [5]
03Brainly
77 [6]
05Zoom
74 [7]

The finding

Lazyweb Research detected 4,814 distinct experiments across 276 companies. source[4] DoorDash is the runaway leader at 221 experiments, more than the next two apps (Wattpad 85, Replit 77) combined. source[1]source[2] Of the 276 companies, 138 clear the 10-experiment eligibility bar — meaning roughly half the corpus is a serious enough experimenter to teardown. source[3]

RankAppDetected experiments
1DoorDash221 source[1]
2Wattpad85 source[2]
3Replit77 source[5]
3Brainly77 source[6]
5Zoom74 source[7]

How to read the ranking

Raw experiment volume reflects both testing intensity and how much surface area an app has. DoorDash's 221 is inflated by a large home/merchandising surface (at least 45 home experiments) source[1], whereas paywall-only apps like Tinder (28, all paywall) rank lower despite concentrated monetization testing. Use the ranking to find who iterates broadly; use the per-company teardowns to see where.

How to apply it

If you are benchmarking your own program, this ranking sets the ceiling: the most-tracked consumer apps run dozens of detectable variations, and half the corpus exceeds 10. A team running fewer than 10 UI experiments over the tracked window is below the median of apps worth tracking. Pick a same-category leader from the teardowns and match its cadence surface-by-surface. source[3]

Caveats

All 4,814 are observed variations with LLM-inferred rationale, not company-confirmed A/B tests — no lift is measured. source[4] Counts use COUNT(DISTINCT experiment_id); the screenshots join would otherwise inflate totals. Volume rankings favor apps with more screens, not necessarily more disciplined experimentation. source[4]

The numbers

#StatComputed from
[1]DoorDash 221 distinct experimentscompany_total:doordash (value 221)
[2]Wattpad 85 distinct experimentscompany_total:wattpad (value 85)
[3]138 of 276 companies have >=10 experimentscompanies_ge10_experiments (138/276)
[4]4,814 experiments across 276 companiestotal_detected_experiments (4814); companies_with_experiments (276)
[5]Replit 77 distinct experimentscompany_total:replit (value 77)
[6]Brainly 77 distinct experimentscompany_total:brainly (value 77)
[7]Zoom 74 distinct experimentscompany_total:zoom (value 74)

Methodology

Universe: 4,814 distinct detected UI experiments across 276 companies (COUNT(DISTINCT experiment_id)), July 2026. Method: before/after screenshot diffs with LLM-inferred rationale, ranked by per-company distinct-experiment count. Caveat: detected variations only, never confirmed A/B tests; volume favors apps with more screens.

Sources

  1. [1]

    Lazyweb Research analysis of 221 detected experiments (DoorDash, ~800-app mobile corpus), July 2026

    COUNT(DISTINCT experiment_id); corpus-leading total.

    Back to text

  2. [2]

    Lazyweb Research analysis of 85 detected experiments (Wattpad, ~800-app mobile corpus), July 2026

    COUNT(DISTINCT experiment_id); second-highest total.

    Back to text

  3. [3]

    Lazyweb Research analysis of 4,814 detected experiments (276 companies, ~800-app mobile corpus), July 2026

    138 companies have >=10 distinct experiments (the page-eligibility bar).

    Back to text

  4. [4]

    Lazyweb Research analysis of 4,814 detected experiments (276 companies, ~800-app mobile corpus), July 2026

    COUNT(DISTINCT experiment_id) across all companies; detection window 2022-10-10 to 2026-07-04.

    Back to text

  5. [5]

    Lazyweb Research analysis of 77 detected experiments (Replit, ~800-app mobile corpus), July 2026

    COUNT(DISTINCT experiment_id).

    Back to text

  6. [6]

    Lazyweb Research analysis of 77 detected experiments (Brainly, ~800-app mobile corpus), July 2026

    COUNT(DISTINCT experiment_id).

    Back to text

  7. [7]

    Lazyweb Research analysis of 74 detected experiments (Zoom, ~800-app mobile corpus), July 2026

    COUNT(DISTINCT experiment_id).

    Back to text

Source: Lazyweb Research — proprietary analysis of real, in-market app screens. Cite as Lazyweb Research, 2026-07-07.